BOMBERGER v. McKELVEY Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A contractor was hired to demolish a building and keep the scarce salvage materials. The owner repudiated the contract, but the contractor performed anyway. The court allowed the contractor to recover the full contract price, finding an exception to the duty to mitigate damages.
Legal Significance: This case establishes an important exception to the rule that a non-breaching party must stop performance upon repudiation. When damages are inadequate and specific performance would be available, the non-breaching party may continue performance and recover the full contract price.
BOMBERGER v. McKELVEY Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Plaintiffs sold real property to Defendants. A separate agreement provided that Plaintiffs would demolish an existing building on the property for $3,500 and were entitled to keep the salvaged materials. Plaintiffs specifically needed the plate glass and skylights from the old building, which were scarce and subject to governmental priority, to complete construction of a new building for a third party. In reliance on obtaining these materials, Plaintiffs designed the new building accordingly and did not order new ones, which would have caused a significant delay. Subsequently, Defendants’ own construction plans were delayed, and they notified Plaintiffs to halt the demolition, thereby repudiating the contract and forbidding them from entering the property. Despite the notice, Plaintiffs entered the land, demolished the building, took the needed salvage materials, and completed their other project. Plaintiffs then sued to recover the $3,500 contract price. Defendants filed a cross-complaint for trespass and waste.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Must a non-breaching party cease performance upon the other party’s repudiation of a contract, or may they continue to perform and recover the full contract price when damages would be inadequate and specific performance would be an appropriate remedy?
Yes, a non-breaching party may continue performance and recover the full contract Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui o
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Must a non-breaching party cease performance upon the other party’s repudiation of a contract, or may they continue to perform and recover the full contract price when damages would be inadequate and specific performance would be an appropriate remedy?
Conclusion
This case establishes a significant equitable exception to the duty to mitigate Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut al
Legal Rule
While an executory contract can generally be repudiated by one party, subjecting Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit e
Legal Analysis
The court began by acknowledging the general rule that upon repudiation of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A party may continue performing a contract after repudiation if damages