Barron Ex Rel. Tiernan v. Mayor of Baltimore Case Brief
Audio lesson available for this case
LSD+ subscribers can listen to a recorded discussion of this brief - the full facts, holding, and reasoning in audio form.
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A wharf owner sued Baltimore, alleging city development projects constituted a “taking” of his property under the Fifth Amendment. The Supreme Court held that the U.S. Constitution’s Bill of Rights does not apply to state governments, only to the federal government.
Legal Significance: This landmark case established that the Bill of Rights acts as a restriction only on the federal government, not on state or local governments. This principle of non-application stood until the doctrine of selective incorporation began applying these rights to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment.
Barron Ex Rel. Tiernan v. Mayor of Baltimore Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
John Barron, the plaintiff, was a co-owner of a profitable wharf in the harbor of Baltimore. He brought an action against the city, alleging that extensive municipal public works projects, including the alteration and paving of streets, had diverted the flow of several streams. This diversion caused large deposits of sand and sediment to accumulate in the harbor near his wharf. The buildup of sediment made the water too shallow for most commercial vessels to approach, which effectively destroyed the wharf’s utility and economic value. Barron contended that this constituted a taking of his private property for public use by the city. He sought financial damages, arguing that he was entitled to just compensation under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Maryland state courts found in favor of the city. Barron then sought a writ of error from the U.S. Supreme Court, asserting that the state court’s judgment was erroneous because the city’s actions violated the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause, which he argued should restrain state governments.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does the Fifth Amendment’s prohibition against taking private property for public use without just compensation apply as a limitation on the actions of state governments?
No. The Supreme Court held that the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause is Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consec
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Does the Fifth Amendment’s prohibition against taking private property for public use without just compensation apply as a limitation on the actions of state governments?
Conclusion
Barron v. Baltimore established the principle that the Bill of Rights does Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis
Legal Rule
The first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, collectively known as Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea
Legal Analysis
Writing for a unanimous Court, Chief Justice Marshall's analysis focused on the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Summary unavailable
No flash summary is available for this opinion.