Connection lost
Server error
UNITED STATES v. SELLS ENGINEERING, INC. Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: The Supreme Court held that Justice Department attorneys pursuing civil cases cannot automatically access grand jury materials from a related criminal investigation. They must obtain a court order by demonstrating a ‘particularized need’ for the secret materials.
Legal Significance: This case strictly limits intra-governmental sharing of grand jury materials, reinforcing the strong policy of grand jury secrecy. It establishes that government civil attorneys are not exempt from the ‘particularized need’ standard required for disclosure under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e).
UNITED STATES v. SELLS ENGINEERING, INC. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
A federal grand jury investigated Sells Engineering, Inc., for criminal fraud and tax evasion, ultimately returning an indictment. The parties reached a plea bargain where the individual respondents pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy. Following the conclusion of the criminal matter, the Justice Department’s Civil Division sought access to all materials from the grand jury investigation. The purpose of the disclosure was to prepare and conduct a civil suit against Sells Engineering under the False Claims Act. The Government argued that its Civil Division attorneys were entitled to automatic disclosure as a matter of right under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)(3)(A)(i), which permits disclosure to an “attorney for the government for use in the performance of such attorney’s duty.” The District Court granted the disclosure motion. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit vacated, holding that Civil Division attorneys could only obtain the materials by seeking a court order under Rule 6(e)(3)(C)(i) and making a showing of particularized need. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve the scope of Rule 6(e)(3)(A)(i).
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)(3)(A)(i) grant Justice Department attorneys automatic access to grand jury materials for use in a civil proceeding, or must they obtain a court order under Rule 6(e)(3)(C)(i) by showing a particularized need?
No. Automatic disclosure of grand jury materials under Rule 6(e)(3)(A)(i) is limited Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)(3)(A)(i) grant Justice Department attorneys automatic access to grand jury materials for use in a civil proceeding, or must they obtain a court order under Rule 6(e)(3)(C)(i) by showing a particularized need?
Conclusion
This decision erects a firm barrier between the government's criminal and civil Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostr
Legal Rule
Disclosure of grand jury materials to government attorneys for use in civil Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad
Legal Analysis
The Court's analysis is grounded in the "long-established policy that maintains the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proid
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- DOJ Civil Division attorneys cannot automatically access grand jury materials for