TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC. v. TESSERA, INC. Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A patent licensor sued its licensee at the International Trade Commission (ITC), despite a contract requiring all “litigation” to be in California. The court held that an ITC proceeding is “litigation” under the contract, forcing the parties to resolve their patent dispute in a California court.
Legal Significance: Establishes that a general forum selection clause requiring “litigation” in a specific venue presumptively includes specialized patent infringement proceedings at the ITC, thereby limiting a patentee’s forum choices and enforcing the parties’ contractual bargain over statutory remedies.
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC. v. TESSERA, INC. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Texas Instruments (TI) and Tessera, Inc. entered into a patent license agreement for semiconductor technology. The agreement contained a forum selection clause stating that any “litigation…which may arise from, under, out of or in connection with this Agreement…shall be litigated in the State of California.” A dispute arose over whether certain TI products were covered by the licensed patents. After negotiations failed, Tessera terminated the agreement and filed a complaint under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 with the International Trade Commission (ITC) in Washington, D.C., alleging patent infringement by TI’s imported products. Prior to Tessera’s ITC filing, TI had filed an action for declaratory judgment of non-infringement in the Central District of California. In response to the ITC action, TI sought a preliminary injunction in the California district court to stop Tessera from pursuing the ITC proceeding, arguing it violated the agreement’s forum selection clause. The district court denied the injunction, concluding that an ITC proceeding was not “litigation” as contemplated by the contract.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a forum selection clause in a patent license agreement requiring all “litigation” to occur in a specific state prevent a party from initiating a patent infringement investigation against the other party at the International Trade Commission?
Yes. The court held that a Section 337 proceeding at the ITC Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id e
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does a forum selection clause in a patent license agreement requiring all “litigation” to occur in a specific state prevent a party from initiating a patent infringement investigation against the other party at the International Trade Commission?
Conclusion
This case confirms that broadly worded forum selection clauses in patent license Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, qu
Legal Rule
In the context of a patent license agreement between sophisticated parties, the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in v
Legal Analysis
The Federal Circuit reversed the district court's finding that TI was not Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adi
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A forum selection clause in a patent license requiring “litigation” in