Connection lost
Server error
Samuel Keller v. Electronic Arts Inc. Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A video game developer used a college football player’s realistic likeness without permission. The court held that the First Amendment did not protect this use because the game was not sufficiently “transformative,” prioritizing the player’s right of publicity over the developer’s free speech rights.
Legal Significance: The case establishes that realistic depictions of public figures in expressive works, like video games, are not protected by the First Amendment if they are not sufficiently “transformative.” It affirms the transformative use test as the controlling standard for balancing publicity rights against free speech claims.
Samuel Keller v. Electronic Arts Inc. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Samuel Keller, a former starting quarterback for Arizona State University and the University of Nebraska, sued Electronic Arts (EA) for violating his right of publicity under California law. EA’s popular NCAA Football video game series featured avatars corresponding to real college players. The avatar representing Keller shared his jersey number, height, weight, physical appearance, home state, and playing style. While players’ names were omitted from the jerseys, the avatars were intended to be realistic recreations that users could control in virtual games set in realistic college stadiums. Keller alleged EA appropriated his likeness for commercial advantage without his consent. In response to Keller’s suit, EA filed a special motion to strike under California’s anti-SLAPP statute, arguing that its use of Keller’s likeness was an expressive work protected by the First Amendment. The district court denied EA’s motion, and EA appealed.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does the First Amendment protect a video game’s realistic depiction of a college athlete from a right of publicity claim where the athlete is portrayed in the same setting and activity for which he is publicly known?
No. The First Amendment does not protect EA’s use of Keller’s likeness Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariat
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does the First Amendment protect a video game’s realistic depiction of a college athlete from a right of publicity claim where the athlete is portrayed in the same setting and activity for which he is publicly known?
Conclusion
This decision reinforces the primacy of the transformative use test in balancing Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in
Legal Rule
Under California law, a right of publicity claim is subject to a Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sin
Legal Analysis
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of EA's anti-SLAPP motion, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incidid
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A video game developer’s realistic depiction of a college athlete in