Connection lost
Server error
Prows v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF UTAH Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: An employee was injured during workplace “horseplay” involving shooting a piece of wood with a rubber band. The court held the injury compensable, finding the horseplay was not a “substantial deviation” from employment and adopted a new four-part test for such cases.
Legal Significance: This case is significant for adopting the influential Larson four-part test to determine when an employee’s participation in horseplay constitutes a “substantial deviation” from employment, thereby taking an injury outside the scope of workers’ compensation coverage.
Prows v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF UTAH Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Michael Prows, a truck driver, was loading medical supplies onto his truck. The supplies were secured with large rubber bands. It was a common practice for employees, including Prows, to engage in “rubber band fights,” a custom known to supervisors who discouraged it. On the day of the incident, two co-workers flipped rubber bands at Prows while he was working. Prows retaliated. One co-worker then approached Prows with a piece of wood from a pallet. Prows took the wood, placed a rubber band between the handles of his hand truck, and attempted to launch the wood like a slingshot. The wood misfired and struck Prows in the eye, causing a severe injury. The Industrial Commission denied his workers’ compensation claim, finding the horseplay was a “complete abandonment” of his duties and therefore did not arise in the scope of his employment.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does an injury sustained by an employee who actively participates in a brief episode of workplace horseplay, which is a known custom at the workplace, arise out of and in the course of employment for workers’ compensation purposes?
Yes. The court reversed the Commission’s denial of benefits, holding as a Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ul
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does an injury sustained by an employee who actively participates in a brief episode of workplace horseplay, which is a known custom at the workplace, arise out of and in the course of employment for workers’ compensation purposes?
Conclusion
This decision establishes the modern, flexible "substantial deviation" test for horseplay cases Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute i
Legal Rule
An injury sustained by a participant in workplace horseplay is compensable if Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet,
Legal Analysis
The Utah Supreme Court began by reaffirming that the state's Workmen's Compensation Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tem
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- An injury from workplace horseplay is compensable if the employee’s participation