New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. v. IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A commodity exchange sued a competitor for copyright infringement for using its daily settlement prices. The court held the prices were unprotectable under the merger doctrine, as the idea of a contract’s value had merged with its numerical expression.
Legal Significance: This case reinforces the merger doctrine as a crucial limit on copyright, preventing the monopolization of ideas (like a market value) where expression is limited to a functional form (like a number), especially when policy does not favor incentivizing the creator.
New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. v. IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
The New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) is a commodities exchange that determines daily settlement prices for futures contracts. These prices are used to value customers’ open positions. For high-volume contracts, prices are calculated using a weighted-average formula. For low-volume contracts with little or no trading activity, a NYMEX committee exercises judgment, weighing various market data to arrive at a price. NYMEX claimed this process involved creative authorship, making the prices original works. IntercontinentalExchange (ICE), a competing electronic exchange, obtained NYMEX’s settlement prices through a licensed data vendor and used them to clear its own customers’ trades. NYMEX sued ICE for copyright infringement, arguing that its settlement prices were copyrightable expressions. The U.S. Copyright Office had previously refused to register a copyright in the prices themselves, granting protection only for the database in which they were compiled.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does the merger doctrine preclude copyright protection for daily settlement prices of futures contracts when the expression of the price is a single number representing the idea of the contract’s market value?
Yes. Even assuming the settlement prices are original works, they are not Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in repr
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Does the merger doctrine preclude copyright protection for daily settlement prices of futures contracts when the expression of the price is a single number representing the idea of the contract’s market value?
Conclusion
This decision illustrates the robust application of the merger doctrine to prevent Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis n
Legal Rule
Under the merger doctrine, copyright protection is withheld from an expression where Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo
Legal Analysis
The Second Circuit affirmed summary judgment for ICE, grounding its decision in Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Issue: Whether daily settlement prices for commodity futures contracts created by