Connection lost
Server error
National Basketball Ass'n v. SDC Basketball Club, Inc. Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: The NBA sought a declaration that it could regulate the Clippers’ franchise relocation to Los Angeles without violating antitrust laws. The court reversed summary judgment for the Clippers, holding that such league rules are not per se illegal and must be evaluated under the fact-intensive rule of reason.
Legal Significance: This case clarifies that the precedent set in Raiders I did not create a per se rule against sports league franchise relocation restrictions. Such restraints are subject to a fact-specific rule of reason analysis, and their legality is not determined as a matter of law.
National Basketball Ass'n v. SDC Basketball Club, Inc. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
The San Diego Clippers, a member franchise of the National Basketball Association (NBA), sought to relocate to Los Angeles. Citing the recent Ninth Circuit decision in Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Comm’n v. National Football League (Raiders I), which found the NFL’s similar rule unlawful as applied, the Clippers announced their move and asserted that any NBA interference would violate antitrust laws. The NBA, wishing to evaluate the move and potentially impose a charge for the usurpation of a valuable market opportunity, was deterred by the threat of antitrust liability. The league had a rule, Article 9, similar to the one at issue in Raiders I, but also argued that other constitutional provisions and past practices implicitly gave it the right to regulate franchise movement. To resolve the impasse and avoid potential liability, the NBA filed a declaratory judgment action, seeking a ruling that its consideration of the move would not violate the Sherman Act. The district court, believing the case was controlled by Raiders I, granted summary judgment for the Clippers.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a professional sports league’s rule requiring league approval for a member franchise’s relocation constitute a per se violation of the Sherman Act, or must its legality be determined under a fact-intensive rule of reason analysis?
Reversed and remanded. The court held that genuine issues of material fact Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does a professional sports league’s rule requiring league approval for a member franchise’s relocation constitute a per se violation of the Sherman Act, or must its legality be determined under a fact-intensive rule of reason analysis?
Conclusion
This case solidifies the principle that sports league franchise relocation rules are Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis
Legal Rule
A professional sports league's rules restricting franchise relocation are not per se Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui o
Legal Analysis
The Ninth Circuit reversed the district court's grant of summary judgment, clarifying Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Reversed summary judgment, holding that a sports league’s franchise relocation rules