Kyllo v. United States Case Brief

Supreme Court of the United States2001Docket #206126
150 L. Ed. 2d 94 121 S. Ct. 2038 533 U.S. 27 2001 U.S. LEXIS 4487 Constitutional Law Criminal Procedure

Complete case briefs with LSD+

Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

3 min read

tl;dr: Police used a thermal imager without a warrant to scan a home for heat consistent with marijuana grow lamps. The Supreme Court held this was a Fourth Amendment “search” because it used sense-enhancing technology not in general public use to obtain information about the home’s interior.

Legal Significance: Established that using sense-enhancing technology not in general public use to obtain information from inside a home that would otherwise require physical intrusion constitutes a Fourth Amendment search, creating a new “bright-line” rule to protect the home from technological surveillance.

Kyllo v. United States Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

Federal agents suspected that Danny Kyllo was growing marijuana in his home using high-intensity lamps. To investigate, an agent used an Agema Thermovision 210 thermal imager from a public street to scan the exterior of Kyllo’s residence. Thermal imagers detect infrared radiation, which is invisible to the naked eye, and translate it into visual images representing relative heat levels. The scan revealed that the roof over the garage and a side wall were significantly warmer than the rest of the house and neighboring homes, a fact consistent with the use of grow lamps. This thermal imaging data, along with other evidence, was used to secure a warrant to search the home. The subsequent search revealed more than 100 marijuana plants. Kyllo moved to suppress the evidence, arguing the warrantless thermal scan was an unconstitutional search.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Does the use of a thermal-imaging device from a public vantage point to detect relative amounts of heat within a private home constitute a “search” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment?

Yes. The use of a thermal imager to scan a home constitutes Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. D

Read the full analysis

The complete holding, rule, and analysis for this case are available to LSD+ subscribers.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

About IRAC analysis

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.

Legal Issue

Does the use of a thermal-imaging device from a public vantage point to detect relative amounts of heat within a private home constitute a “search” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment?

Conclusion

The decision established a crucial bulwark against technological surveillance of the home, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis

Legal Rule

Where the Government uses a device that is not in general public Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis au

Legal Analysis

The Court, in an opinion by Justice Scalia, held that the government's Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolo

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • Using a thermal imager to scan a home from a public
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepte

Read the full analysis

The complete holding, rule, and analysis for this case are available to LSD+ subscribers.

Start 14-Day Free Trial