Case Citation
Legal Case Name

Jose Antonio Barraza Rivera v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Case Brief

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit1990Docket #395348
913 F.2d 1443 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 15945 Immigration Law Administrative Law International Law

Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs

Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

General Brief
4 min read

tl;dr: A Salvadoran soldier fled after his lieutenant ordered him to commit paid assassinations. The court found that refusing to participate in such inhuman acts constitutes a valid basis for an asylum claim, reversing the immigration board’s denial and remanding the case.

Legal Significance: Established that an alien’s refusal to participate in inhuman acts ordered by a military entity, based on conscience, can constitute persecution on account of political opinion or religion, thereby establishing eligibility for asylum under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Jose Antonio Barraza Rivera v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

Jose Antonio Barraza Rivera, a Salvadoran military recruit, was ordered by his lieutenant to participate in the paid assassination of two individuals. The lieutenant threatened him, asking, “what do you prefer, that they kill you or kill them?” Believing the order was morally wrong, Barraza deserted, obtained a passport, and fled to the United States. He applied for political asylum and withholding of deportation, fearing persecution from the military for his desertion and refusal to obey the unlawful order. He also feared persecution from anti-government guerrillas due to his prior military service. The Immigration Judge (IJ) denied his application, finding him not credible. The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissed his appeal. While the BIA assumed Barraza’s testimony was credible for its decision, it concluded he had not established a well-founded fear of persecution because the threat was not government-sanctioned and the ordering officer was likely dead.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Does an alien establish a well-founded fear of persecution for asylum eligibility by showing they fled their country’s military after refusing an order from a superior officer to participate in an inhuman act, such as a paid assassination?

Yes. The BIA’s decision denying asylum was not supported by substantial evidence. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.

Legal Issue

Does an alien establish a well-founded fear of persecution for asylum eligibility by showing they fled their country’s military after refusing an order from a superior officer to participate in an inhuman act, such as a paid assassination?

Conclusion

This case is significant for establishing that an asylum claim can be Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehe

Legal Rule

An alien may establish eligibility for asylum by demonstrating a well-founded fear Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in c

Legal Analysis

The court assumed the petitioner's testimony was credible, as the BIA had Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in re

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • A soldier who deserts to avoid participating in inhuman acts, such
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est lab

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?