Connection lost
Server error
Grimes v. Alteon, Inc. Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: An oral agreement between a CEO and a stockholder for the stockholder to purchase 10% of a future stock offering, without board approval or a written instrument, was held unenforceable under Delaware corporate law, which requires both for such commitments.
Legal Significance: Reinforces Delaware’s policy requiring formal board approval and written instruments for stock issuance and related rights, ensuring board authority over capital structure and certainty for investors.
Grimes v. Alteon, Inc. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Charles L. Grimes, a significant stockholder in Alteon, Inc., alleged an oral agreement with Alteon’s CEO, Kenneth I. Moch. Moch purportedly promised Grimes the opportunity to purchase 10% of any future private stock offering to prevent dilution of Grimes’s existing 9.9% holdings, and Grimes, in return, orally promised to buy said 10%. This alleged bilateral agreement was never memorialized in a written instrument, nor was it ever presented to or approved by Alteon’s board of directors. Subsequently, Alteon publicly announced a private placement stock offering but did not permit Grimes to participate. Grimes filed suit in the Delaware Court of Chancery seeking specific performance and damages, asserting the enforceability of the oral agreement. Alteon moved to dismiss under Court of Chancery Rule 12(b)(6), arguing, inter alia, that the agreement constituted a “right” under 8 Del. C. § 157 and was thus invalid due to the lack of board approval and a writing. The Court of Chancery granted the motion to dismiss on this basis.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Is an alleged oral agreement between a corporation’s CEO and a stockholder, obligating the corporation to sell and the stockholder to buy a percentage of a future stock offering, enforceable under Delaware law when it lacks board of directors’ approval and is not memorialized in a written instrument?
No. The alleged oral agreement is unenforceable. The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Is an alleged oral agreement between a corporation’s CEO and a stockholder, obligating the corporation to sell and the stockholder to buy a percentage of a future stock offering, enforceable under Delaware law when it lacks board of directors’ approval and is not memorialized in a written instrument?
Conclusion
This case underscores the critical importance of adhering to statutory formalities, specifically Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea com
Legal Rule
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL), particularly 8 Del. C. § Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut
Legal Analysis
The Court reasoned that the DGCL establishes a comprehensive statutory framework designed Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exe
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- An oral agreement by a CEO to sell a stockholder 10%