Greenberg v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A property buyer sued a title insurer in tort for failing to find title defects. The court held that a title insurance policy is a contract of indemnity, not a service contract, so no separate tort duty to search exists. Recovery is limited to the policy.
Legal Significance: Establishes that a title insurer’s liability is governed by contract law. Absent a separate undertaking, no tort action for negligent title search exists, reinforcing the boundary between tort and contract duties for purely economic loss.
Greenberg v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Martin Greenberg purchased four condominiums after obtaining title commitments and subsequent owner’s title insurance policies from Stewart Title Guaranty Company (Stewart) through its agent, Southeastern Wisconsin Title Company (Southeastern). When Greenberg attempted to sell the units, he discovered alleged liens and encumbrances that rendered the titles unmarketable. This led to foreclosure and substantial deficiency judgments against him. Greenberg sued Stewart and Southeastern, asserting claims for, among others, negligence and negligent misrepresentation. He argued that the defendants owed him a common law duty to conduct a reasonably diligent search of public records and disclose any defects, and that this duty existed separate from their contractual obligations under the insurance policy. The trial court dismissed the tort claims, finding the relationship was purely contractual and governed by the indemnity provisions of the policy. The Wisconsin Supreme Court accepted certification to decide whether a title insurer could be held liable in tort for failure to discover a title defect.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does the issuance of a title commitment and subsequent title insurance policy create a common law duty in tort for a title insurer to search for and disclose title defects, separate from its contractual obligation to indemnify the insured?
No. The court affirmed the dismissal of the tort claims. A title Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia dese
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Does the issuance of a title commitment and subsequent title insurance policy create a common law duty in tort for a title insurer to search for and disclose title defects, separate from its contractual obligation to indemnify the insured?
Conclusion
This case solidifies the distinction between contracts for indemnity and contracts for Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor
Legal Rule
A title insurance company or its agent is not liable in negligence Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa q
Legal Analysis
The court rejected Greenberg's argument that a common law duty to search Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A title insurance policy is a contract of indemnity, not a