CONN. GENERAL LIFE INS. v. FIRST NAT. BANK Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A settlor’s will, purporting to cancel all prior trusts, failed to revoke a life insurance trust because the trust instrument required a specific method of revocation—written notice to the trustee during the settlor’s lifetime—which was not followed.
Legal Significance: This case affirms the majority rule that a revocable inter vivos trust cannot be revoked by will unless the trust instrument expressly permits it. The method of revocation specified in the trust document is exclusive.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
John W. Aughenbaugh created a revocable life insurance trust, naming First National Bank of Minneapolis as trustee and his then-wife and children as beneficiaries. The trust was to be funded by a life insurance policy. The trust instrument provided that the settlor could revoke or amend it “by a written instrument delivered to the Trustee.” Subsequently, Aughenbaugh divorced his first wife and married Marilyn Aughenbaugh. Shortly before his death, he executed a new will which stated it was intended to “supercede and cancel any previous wills or trusts established by me.” This will was not delivered to the trustee during the settlor’s lifetime. Upon Aughenbaugh’s death, both his widow, Marilyn, and the trustee claimed the insurance proceeds. The insurance company filed an interpleader action to resolve the competing claims. The trial court ruled in favor of the trustee, holding that the trust remained in effect. The widow appealed.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Can a settlor revoke a formal inter vivos trust through a general revocation clause in his will when the trust instrument specifies that revocation must be accomplished by a written instrument delivered to the trustee during the settlor’s lifetime?
No. The settlor’s will did not effectively revoke the inter vivos trust. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla p
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Can a settlor revoke a formal inter vivos trust through a general revocation clause in his will when the trust instrument specifies that revocation must be accomplished by a written instrument delivered to the trustee during the settlor’s lifetime?
Conclusion
This case reinforces the principle that the formal requirements for revoking an Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliqui
Legal Rule
A revocable life insurance trust is a non-testamentary, inter vivos instrument. Where Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo co
Legal Analysis
The court's analysis proceeded in two parts. First, it affirmed the legal Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A revocable life insurance trust is an inter vivos (non-testamentary) instrument,